Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:59:39 -0600 | From | Matthew Wilcox <> | Subject | Re: Announce: Semaphore-Removal tree |
| |
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:54:39PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Willy, > > On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:00:21 -0600 Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote: > > > > Stephen, could you pick these patches up for linux-next? > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/willy/misc.git semaphore-removal > > This is in addition to the semaphore branch? Should it go before or after > that i.e. does it depend on it?
It's in addition to, and it's independent of it. I don't intend to create any conflicts or dependencies between them. In case I do ... let's say semaphore-removal goes after semaphore.
-- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."
| |