Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:48:37 +0200 | From | "Michael Kerrisk" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] alternative to sys_indirect, part 1 |
| |
On 4/24/08, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > > But this approach fixes just one of the interfaces. There are 7 or 8 > > other interfaces that need to solve the same problem. What about > > those? > > > Actually it seems to fix most of them.
Am I missingg something? How? There a number of system calls that have neither a flags argument, nor another argument that we can overload (as you propose with socket()). For those, we'd need new system calls os sys_indirect().
> I accept Jakub's observation we > need a "paccept()" or similar.
True, that would be nice.
| |