Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:45:36 +0100 | From | Alan Cox <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] alternative to sys_indirect, part 1 |
| |
> Once again, this is not about assigned values. This is about the time > before you get a value assigned. Not every experiment out there will > have a value assigned before it starts development.
And no value used by a random experiment on the internet belongs in any one elses code. When it hits the kernel main tree it becomes definitive and will remain so. Until then it remains someones devel hack.
The same is true about syscall numbers so your argument on this is slightly less than sound.
| |