Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:39:08 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: [PATCH] alternative to sys_indirect, part 1 | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
> > > On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > Given we will never have 2^32 socket types, and in a sense this is part > > of the type why not just use > > > > socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, ...) > > Ok, I have to admit that I find this very appealing. It looks much > cleaner, but perhaps more importantly, it also looks both readable _and_ > easier to use for the user-space programmer.
Me too.
| |