lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] iwlwifi: Don't unlock priv->mutex if it isn't locked
Date
Commit b716bb91 ("iwlwifi: Cancel scanning upon association") moved the
test of priv->vif in iwl{3945,4964}_mac_config_interface() outside of
where priv->mutex is held, but still tries to do mutex_unlock() on
return. This is clearly wrong and triggers a nasty lockdep warning when
this codepath is triggered. Fix this by removing the mutex_unlock().

Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
---
Assuming the original b716bb91 commit is correct, this is probably the
right fix. But I'm not sure if it's correct to look at priv->vif
without holding priv->mutex, so maybe the fix is more complicated.

drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c | 1 -
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl4965-base.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
index 1a5678f..a1a0b3c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
@@ -6907,7 +6907,6 @@ static int iwl3945_mac_config_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,

if (priv->vif != vif) {
IWL_DEBUG_MAC80211("leave - priv->vif != vif\n");
- mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex);
return 0;
}

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl4965-base.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl4965-base.c
index d7e2358..d0bbcaa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl4965-base.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl4965-base.c
@@ -6473,7 +6473,6 @@ static int iwl4965_mac_config_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,

if (priv->vif != vif) {
IWL_DEBUG_MAC80211("leave - priv->vif != vif\n");
- mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex);
return 0;
}


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-24 01:25    [W:0.035 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site