lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Introduce __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SYSFS
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Will Newton <will.newton@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 03:36:23PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> > > +config ARCH_HAS_SYS_SYSFS
> > > + bool
> > > + default y
> > > +
> > > source "init/Kconfig"
> > >
> >
> > Sorry, I meant something more like
> >
> >
> > config ARCH_HAS_SYS_SYSFS
> > def_bool !BLACKFIN
> > help
> > Obsolete sys_sysfs syscall
> >
> > in init/Kconfig
> >
> > But, it's your patch, you can do it however you like. :)
>
> That's definitely shorter - but it feels a bit more like #ifdef
> CONFIG_BLACKFIN which is explicitly what I don't want to do, because
> I'm not actually interested in blackfin. ;-)

i'd have to agree that updating asm/unistd.h fits better with existing
paradigm. if we want to talk about converting *all cases* to Kconfig,
we can do it in a separate thread. splitting the design between two
different files is simply confusing to everyone involved as they spend
their time going "well which way am *i* supposed to do it".
-mike


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-23 18:07    [W:0.073 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site