Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:13:20 -0700 (PDT) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 03 of 12] get_task_mm should not succeed if mmput() is running and has reduced |
| |
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:23:16PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > Missing signoff by you. > > I thought I had to signoff if I conributed with anything that could > resemble copyright? Given I only merged that patch, I can add an > Acked-by if you like, but merging this in my patchset was already an > implicit ack ;-).
No you have to include a signoff if the patch goes through your custody chain. This one did.
Also add a
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
somewhere if you want to signify that the patch came from me.
| |