lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: kmemcheck caught read from freed memory (cfq_free_io_context)
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 02:01:13PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > I will check this when I get back to some bandwidth -- but in the meantime,
> > does kmemcheck special-case SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU? It is legal to access
> > newly-freed items in that case, as long as you did rcu_read_lock()
> > before gaining a reference to them and don't hold the reference past
> > the matching rcu_read_unlock().
>
> No, kmemcheck is work in progress and does not know about
> SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU yet. The reason I asked Vegard to post the warning
> was because Peter, Vegard, and myself identified this particular
> warning as a real problem. But yeah, kmemcheck can cause false
> positives for RCU for now.

Would the following be an appropriate fix? It seems to me to be in
the same spirit as the existing check for s->ctor.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

slub_kmemcheck.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub_kmemcheck.c b/mm/slub_kmemcheck.c
index 8620a8b..e07f62a 100644
--- a/mm/slub_kmemcheck.c
+++ b/mm/slub_kmemcheck.c
@@ -93,6 +93,6 @@ kmemcheck_slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, void *object)
void
kmemcheck_slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
{
- if (!s->ctor)
+ if (!s->ctor && !(s->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU))
kmemcheck_mark_freed(object, s->objsize);
}

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-02 18:11    [W:0.109 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site