Messages in this thread | | | From | Oliver Neukum <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Introduce new top level suspend and hibernation callbacks (rev. 6) | Date | Wed, 2 Apr 2008 17:28:44 +0200 |
| |
Am Mittwoch, 2. April 2008 17:13:11 schrieb Alan Stern: > Basically yes. Subsystems and drivers are allowed to keep devices > suspended if they were suspended before the system went to sleep. > Remember, the purpose of the resume method is to let drivers know that > the system is now awake, not to force them to put their devices into a > high-power state.
Well, sometimes it is exactly that what we desire, eg. as a side effect of lsusb. Should the callbacks have different semantics depending on the reason you call them? And how should that information be transferred?
Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |