Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:31:10 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: x86: spinlock ops are always-inlined |
| |
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:47:21 GMT Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> wrote:
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7fda20f146d5d217684ffbc37c6b6c5f82c2dffd > Commit: 7fda20f146d5d217684ffbc37c6b6c5f82c2dffd > Parent: d93c870bad38e8daaaf9f7e900a13431f24becbb > Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > AuthorDate: Fri Feb 29 10:29:38 2008 +0100 > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > CommitDate: Thu Apr 17 17:41:29 2008 +0200 > > x86: spinlock ops are always-inlined > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > --- > include/asm-x86/spinlock.h | 12 ++++++------ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h b/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h > index 47dfe26..bc6376f 100644 > --- a/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h > +++ b/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h > @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static inline int __raw_spin_is_contended(raw_spinlock_t *lock) > return (((tmp >> 8) & 0xff) - (tmp & 0xff)) > 1; > } > > -static inline void __raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) > +static __always_inline void __raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
What was the reason for making this change?
| |