lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectBUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!
Hi there,

just before upgrading from -rc9 to -final, this showed up in the logs:

BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!
turning off the locking correctness validator.
Pid: 30729, comm: mv Not tainted 2.6.25-rc9 #2
[<c013a842>] save_trace+0x92/0xa0
[<c013a894>] add_lock_to_list+0x44/0xc0
[<c013cfe1>] __lock_acquire+0xec1/0xf90
[<c01756a3>] lock_rename+0x73/0xf0
[<c013d36c>] lock_release_non_nested+0x10c/0x1b0
[<c01756a3>] lock_rename+0x73/0xf0
[<c017573b>] unlock_rename+0x1b/0x60
[<c013d4a7>] lock_release+0x97/0x170
[<c04857e3>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x53/0x110
[<c017573b>] unlock_rename+0x1b/0x60
[<c017827b>] sys_renameat+0x1fb/0x210
[<c0486893>] _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x33/0x60
[<c016e7b2>] vfs_write+0x102/0x140
[<c01782b7>] sys_rename+0x27/0x30
[<c0102eb6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0xa5
=======================

A quick search on the net tells me, this has been reported around ~2.6.18,
but this was back in 2006. My box here is still running fine, and I'm not
sure how to reproduce this one - there hasn't been much I/O when the BUG
occured. I just wanted t have this reported...

Full dmesg and .config: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.25-rc9/

Thanks,
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #339:

manager in the cable duct


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-18 00:03    [W:0.024 / U:0.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site