lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Reporting bugs and bisection
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 01:38:18PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> > > And frankly, that's the only thing that matters anyway; I suspect
> > > I'd do rather well by proposed criteria, but you know what? I don't give
> > > a flying f*ck through the rolling doughnut for self-appointed PHBs and
> > > their idea of performance reviews.
> >
> > (Geez, conflate the issue much?) No one is saying you should. But
> > also, I haven't seen anyone saying it'd be used for performance
> > reviews other than you.
>
>
> || If there are individuals at whom a finger needs to be pointed, this
> || system will highlight them, and fingers will (and should) be pointed.
> || Contributors of poor-quality code need to be weeded-out.
>
> in this thread (From: David Newall).

Ah, I failed reading comprehension, yet again. Well, sounds like you
have a beef to take up with David, then. That's still not an argument
against trying to gather statistics and to see if they're worth
anything.

> > <shrug> Shame and Guilt, two major motivators of human behavior, it's
> > true. But, one last time, *you're* the one saying the stats would be
> > used for finger pointing at people.
>
> Not really. Unless you are trying to imply that David is my sock puppet, that
> is...

Momentarily amusing to think so, but no :-).


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-17 23:05    [W:0.096 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site