Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:54:52 -0700 (PDT) | From | Alex Davis <> | Subject | Re: [patch 00/66] 2.6.24-stable review |
| |
I code, therefore I am
--- On Thu, 4/17/08, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
> From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> > Subject: Re: [patch 00/66] 2.6.24-stable review > To: "Alex Davis" <alex14641@yahoo.com> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org > Date: Thursday, April 17, 2008, 1:33 PM > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 08:05:56AM -0700, Alex Davis wrote: > > Apologies to anyone who receives this message twice. > > > > Is the patch referenced in > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/10/409 necessary > > for stable? > > It's a 2.6.25-rc regression fixed in 2.6.25. > > cu > Adrian Thanks. I just looked at the 2.6.24.4 version of the same file and, seeing that the section of code the patch applied to was the same,(erroneously) assumed the patch might be needed.
> -- > > "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan > asked suddenly out > of the darkness. There had been need of rain for > many days. > "Only a promise," Lao Er said. > Pearl S. Buck - > Dragon Seed
____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
| |