Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:55:12 +1000 | From | Paul Mackerras <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86: fix find_next_bit breakage on ppc and powerpc |
| |
Ingo Molnar writes: > > * Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack.com> wrote: > > > Powerpc (and ppc) have their have some code in their bitops.h which > > used to be exacly the same as asm-generic/bitops/find.h. Include this > > header instead. > > > > This should also fix the compile problems due to the generic > > find_next_bit changes. Those were fixed by Thomas Gleixner in > > asm-generic/bitops/find.h earlier. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm> > > thanks, applied. I dropped:
Why are powerpc (and ppc) patches - not being sent to the powerpc maintainer (me) - not being cc'd to the linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org list - ending up going through the x86 tree?
How come patches to unify x86_32 and x86_64 bitops need to end up touching powerpc?
Paul.
| |