Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:46:52 +0200 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [patch 2/2] bootmem: Node-setup agnostic free_bootmem() |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:56:57 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote: > >> Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> writes: >> >>> Make free_bootmem() look up the node holding the specified address >>> range which lets it work transparently on single-node and multi-node >>> configurations. >> Acked-by: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> >> >> This is far better than the original change it replaces and which >> I also objected to in review. >> > > So... do we think these two patches are sufficiently safe and important for > 2.6.25?
It's only strictly needed for .26 I think for some (also slightly dubious) changes queued in git-x86.
-Andi
| |