Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:04:03 -0700 | From | "Yinghai Lu" <> | Subject | Re: [patch 2/2] bootmem: Node-setup agnostic free_bootmem() |
| |
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:56:57 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote: > > > Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> writes: > > > > > Make free_bootmem() look up the node holding the specified address > > > range which lets it work transparently on single-node and multi-node > > > configurations. > > > > Acked-by: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> > > > > This is far better than the original change it replaces and which > > I also objected to in review. > > > > So... do we think these two patches are sufficiently safe and important for > 2.6.25?
the patch is wrong
YH
| |