[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0 of 9] mmu notifier #v12
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> The difference with #v11 is a different implementation of mm_lock that
> guarantees handling signals in O(N). It's also more lowlatency friendly.

Ok. So the rest of the issues remains unaddressed? I am glad that we
finally settled on the locking. But now I will have to clean this up,
address the remaining issues, sequence the patches right, provide docs,
handle the merging issue etc etc? I have seen no detailed review of my
patches that you include here.

We are going down the same road as we had to go with the OOM patches where
David Rientjes and me had to deal with the issues you raised?

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-15 01:13    [W:0.102 / U:0.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site