Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: Introduce new top level suspend and hibernation callbacks (rev. 8) | Date | Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:56:01 +0200 |
| |
On Monday, 14 of April 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 12:55 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Mon 2008-04-14 08:47:02, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > > > Well, I'm not sure and I'm not going to introduce the change right now, after > > > > the paches have been included in -mm. > > > > > > > > That would require quite some changes in the core code that I'd prefer to > > > > avoid for now. We can do something like this in a separate patch series after > > > > the present one settles down a bit. > > > > > > I disagree. > > > > > > Doing it later would introduce yet another major semantic change. > > > > 'allow load_firmware from prepare that was not allowed before' is not 'major'. > > Having user space fully operating is major.
Please tell me what exactly is wrong with doing things that depend on the user space being available from notifiers.
Thanks, Rafael
| |