Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:36:24 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [Fwd: [-mm] Add an owner to the mm_struct (v9)] |
| |
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:04:28 -0700 "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote: > > Balbir Singh wrote: > > > > > If nobody has any specific objection to this patch, can I go ahead and > > request > > > Andrew to include this patch? > > > > > > > ->owner in struct mm_struct is very useful for revokeat() so > > > > Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> > > > > Reviewed-by: Paul Menage <menage@google.com> > > I'm still not sure when to use Acked-by versus Reviewed-by - is it > just based on the level of scrutiny/review? >
Yes. Reviewed-by: is a lot stronger that Acked-by:. I've seen some pretty shocking Acked-by:'s :)
Documentation/SubmittingPatches goes into a surprising amount of detail.
| |