Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:42:03 -0500 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: boot cgroup questions |
| |
Max K wrote: > I agree in general. In this particular case additional grouping introduces > even more hierarchy. I seems to me that > "irqN -> cpu1, cpu2, cpu3" > is a very simple, straightforward relationship. Whereas > "irqN -> groupX" > "groupX -> cpu1" > "groupX -> cpu2" > "groupX -> cpu3" > Is not that straightforward.
Clearly, yes, the first is simpler than the second.
The question is which is correct.
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
| |