lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: boot cgroup questions
Max K wrote:
> I agree in general. In this particular case additional grouping introduces
> even more hierarchy. I seems to me that
> "irqN -> cpu1, cpu2, cpu3"
> is a very simple, straightforward relationship. Whereas
> "irqN -> groupX"
> "groupX -> cpu1"
> "groupX -> cpu2"
> "groupX -> cpu3"
> Is not that straightforward.

Clearly, yes, the first is simpler than the second.

The question is which is correct.

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-14 20:47    [W:0.173 / U:1.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site