Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: Microblaze Linux release | Date | Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:38:28 +0200 |
| |
On Sunday 13 April 2008, Michal Simek wrote: > I would like to ask you for review all microblaze code especially > arch/microblaze and include/asm-microblaze. Please don't send me question to > drivers - Microblaze will use only uartlite driver (only add on or to Kconfig - > that's enough for now).
I'm certainly willing to help review it, but I think the timing is too short for asking for a 2.6.26 merge. Judging from experience, a new architecture review takes a few weeks to sort out all the issues you want resolved before merging, so posting them now would put you in a much more comfortable position when targeting a 2.6.27 merge.
One of the things I always wanted to have is a common location for all the things that get duplicated verbatim into each new architecture, like all the include/asm/{fcntl,ioctls,ipcbuf,mman,poll,posix_types,sem_buf}.h and others that define part of the syscall ABI.
Arnd <><
| |