Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 13 Apr 2008 04:01:30 -0400 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3 |
| |
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 08:55:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > it's a dead filesystem that a very few people still have a reason to > > use. If FUSE is where this should live, then I'll just simply focus my > > time on that instead (since I already have it in FUSE). > > Yes, pursuing the FUSE implementation sounds a better approach - it avoids > burdening the kernel with a filesysstem which few will be interested in and > is more practical for use by those who _are_ interested in it.
No way. For a normal foreign block filesystem a proper kernel implementation is much better. And this one is particularly well-written. Lately I really start wondering why we keep adding crap all over the core, but if we have a modular new filesystem that's quite nice people start complaining.
> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ---end quoted text---
| |