Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:57:43 +0900 | From | Toshiharu Harada <> | Subject | Re: [TOMOYO #7 30/30] Hooks for SAKURA and TOMOYO. |
| |
On 4/9/2008 9:49 PM, Stephen Smalley wrote: >> We cordially request LSM changes to pass vfsmount parameters. > > Don't cordially request it - submit patches to make it happen. Or work > with others who have been submitting such patches.
You are (always) right. :)
> There are two options: > 1) Submit patches to pass down the vfsmounts to the vfs helpers so that > they can be passed to the existing security_inode hooks. -or- > 2) Submit patches to add new security hooks to the callers where the > vfsmount is already available (some have suggested moving the existing > security_inode hooks to the callers, but that would cause problems for > SELinux as I've posted elsewhere, so adding new hooks is preferable, and > then SELinux can just default to the dummy functions for those new > hooks).
Thank you for your suggestions. I drew a diagram. Is this correct?
Regards, Toshiharu Harada NTT DATA CORPORATION [image] |  |