Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:45:54 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() during suspend with 2.6.25-rc8 |
| |
On Tue 2008-04-08 00:33:48, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > The mce resume is a sysdev. > > > sysdevs were always supposed to run completely with interrupts off. If they > > > don't anymore that's some kind of higher level resume code bug which you need > > > to fix there, not hack around in the low level code. > > They are executed with interrupts disabled, on one CPU. > > So, any idea why mce_resume() -> mce_init() -> debug_smp_processor_id() > triggers the warning? Apparently preempt_count is zero, irqs_disabled() > returns false, and cpumask_of_cpu() is not equal to current->cpus_allowed.
We are single-threaded because we 'unplugged' all the other cpus... but I'm not sure the BUG() code realises that...
> So there clearly is a bug somewhere. > > > > Obviously turning on preemption anywhere around the machine check is > > > fatal because it touches CPU state and if you reschedule you could > > > switch to another CPU and change or access the wrong CPU's state. > > FWIW, at the point when sysdevs are resumed we are single-threaded. > > Is that really relevant here? We still could be switched over to another > CPU, and that would break things.
There are no other CPUs.
-- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
|  |