Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:07:48 -0700 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (ftrace) |
| |
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:14:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all, > > [I have been asked to provide a summary of changes before the biolerplate > so here goes (please tell me if this is what you want or not). I am not > going to try to describe the changes in the individual trees, just the > interactions between them.] > > Changes since next-20080410: > > I no longer revert "x86: phase out forced inlining". > There is a new conflict in arch/s390/lib/uaccess_pt.c between the s390 and > kvm trees. > There is a new trivial white space conflict in arch/ia64/kernel/mca.c. > I no longer need to revert "wusb: add the wireless usb stack to Linux". > > Today's Next/Trees file is lying: the x86-latest and sched-latest trees > did not merge/build correctly so have not been included. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I have created today's linux-next tree at > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git > (tar balls at > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/).
trace selftest build fails when CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=n:
next-20080410/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c:413: error: implicit declaration of function 'rt_mutex_setprio' make[3]: *** [kernel/trace/trace.o] Error 1
Possible fixes:
kernel/trace/Kconfig: SCHED_TRACER can depend on RT_MUTEXES or there can be a stub for rt_mutex_setprio() when RT_MUTEXES=n
And kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c still needs #include <sched.h> added to it.
--- ~Randy
| |