Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:27:36 -0500 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: add cpus_scnprintf function v3 |
| |
Bert wrote: > My statement from above doesn't reflect my opinion. I'm still in > flavor with the mask output. And from this discussion, I found a new > point for the mask output: its bounded ;-)
Ok
> I just wanted to note, that these new list attributes would be the > only way to 'change' the api, ie. introduce a new api and deprecate > the old one, and not change the format of the present api.
Agreed
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
| |