lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: file offset corruption on 32-bit machines?
Date
[Adding fsdevel list]

On Tuesday 08 April 2008 10:05:47 am Meelis Roos wrote:
> Jeff Robertson analyzes the behaviour of different operating systems'
> 64-bit file offset implementation and concludes that on 32-bit
> machines, Linux and Solaris lack any locking to keep the two 32-bit
> halves in sync and this could cause rare file offset corruption.
>
> http://jeffr-tech.livejournal.com/21014.html

AFAICS, this race is theoretically possible, but it is very hard (almost
impossible) to trigger with a sane file usage pattern.
Note that you have to access shared struct file (same file descriptor) in
different threads which should be synchronized by caller anyway (*).

I also don't see any security implications from this race, but maybe someone
with more knowlage about fs can see (f_pos is used at many places in the
kernel code).

I think that it is better to live with tiny-race-on-broken-patterns rather
than paying for synchronization which is not needed for correct paths.

[*] file_pos_{read,write} (fs/read_write.c) are not called under lock (in
sys_read, sys_write, ...), so even if f_pos is written atomically, you will
be able to get races when accessing shared descriptor from different threads.
I think that POSIX states, that behavior is undefined under these conditions.

Best regards
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-10 15:59    [W:0.114 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site