lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [2.6.25-rc6] possible regression: X server dying
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:53:29 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc> wrote:
[...]
>> > | Backtrace:
>> > | 0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x81) [0x80e6d81]
>> > | 1: [0xb7fc9400]
>> > | 2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so(_swrast_Triangle+0x2d) [0xb51ea5dd]
>> > | 3: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so [0xb51f1075]
>> > | 4: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so [0xb5206f2e]
>> > | 5: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so [0xb52080b8]
>> > | 6: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so(_tnl_run_pipeline+0x153) [0xb520cb83]
>> > | 7: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so(_tnl_draw_prims+0x3f0) [0xb51f8340]
>> > | 8: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so(vbo_exec_vtx_flush+0x1fb) [0xb52471eb]
>> > | 9: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so(vbo_exec_FlushVertices+0x78) [0xb52488e8]
>> > | 10: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so(_mesa_Flush+0x83) [0xb5112663]
>> > | 11: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libglx.so [0xb7c6a107]
>> > | 12: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libglx.so [0xb7c4aa6d]
>> > | 13: /usr/bin/X [0x815809e]
>> > | 14: /usr/bin/X(Dispatch+0x1af) [0x808f68f]
>> > | 15: /usr/bin/X(main+0x47e) [0x807717e]
>> > | 16: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe0) [0xb7d5dfe0]
>> > | 17: /usr/bin/X(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0x1e5) [0x8076501]
>> > |
>> > | Fatal server error:
>> > | Caught signal 11. Server aborting
>
> any look finding what might have caused this?

Not really. It's obviously triggered by the screensaver. The machine
runs SuSE's default: gnome-screensaver with mode = random and a list
of 189 candidate screensavers, so I can't tell which one(s) of those
actually triggers the problem.

But perhaps that doesn't matter anyway. I recently collected another
X backtrace with kernel 2.6.25-rc7 which looks quite different in
the libglx section:

0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x81) [0x80e6d81]
1: [0xb7ef7400]
2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libglx.so [0xb7b7d8e8]
3: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libglx.so(DoRender+0xdd) [0xb7b7645d]
4: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libglx.so [0xb7b7657c]
5: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libglx.so [0xb7b7aa6d]
6: /usr/bin/X [0x815809e]
7: /usr/bin/X(Dispatch+0x1af) [0x808f68f]
8: /usr/bin/X(main+0x47e) [0x807717e]
9: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe0) [0xb7c8bfe0]
10: /usr/bin/X(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0x1e5) [0x8076501]

But I know next to nothing about GL, so I'm out of my depth there.
I'd welcome any suggestions on how to provoke the crash more
regularly so that I could attempt to bisect.

Thanks,
Tilman

--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-01 11:05    [W:0.106 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site