Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:02:55 +0100 | From | Tilman Schmidt <> | Subject | Re: [2.6.25-rc6] possible regression: X server dying |
| |
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:53:29 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc> wrote: [...] >> > | Backtrace: >> > | 0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x81) [0x80e6d81] >> > | 1: [0xb7fc9400] >> > | 2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so(_swrast_Triangle+0x2d) [0xb51ea5dd] >> > | 3: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so [0xb51f1075] >> > | 4: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so [0xb5206f2e] >> > | 5: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so [0xb52080b8] >> > | 6: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so(_tnl_run_pipeline+0x153) [0xb520cb83] >> > | 7: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so(_tnl_draw_prims+0x3f0) [0xb51f8340] >> > | 8: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so(vbo_exec_vtx_flush+0x1fb) [0xb52471eb] >> > | 9: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so(vbo_exec_FlushVertices+0x78) [0xb52488e8] >> > | 10: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libGLcore.so(_mesa_Flush+0x83) [0xb5112663] >> > | 11: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libglx.so [0xb7c6a107] >> > | 12: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libglx.so [0xb7c4aa6d] >> > | 13: /usr/bin/X [0x815809e] >> > | 14: /usr/bin/X(Dispatch+0x1af) [0x808f68f] >> > | 15: /usr/bin/X(main+0x47e) [0x807717e] >> > | 16: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe0) [0xb7d5dfe0] >> > | 17: /usr/bin/X(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0x1e5) [0x8076501] >> > | >> > | Fatal server error: >> > | Caught signal 11. Server aborting > > any look finding what might have caused this?
Not really. It's obviously triggered by the screensaver. The machine runs SuSE's default: gnome-screensaver with mode = random and a list of 189 candidate screensavers, so I can't tell which one(s) of those actually triggers the problem.
But perhaps that doesn't matter anyway. I recently collected another X backtrace with kernel 2.6.25-rc7 which looks quite different in the libglx section:
0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x81) [0x80e6d81] 1: [0xb7ef7400] 2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libglx.so [0xb7b7d8e8] 3: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libglx.so(DoRender+0xdd) [0xb7b7645d] 4: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libglx.so [0xb7b7657c] 5: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//extensions/libglx.so [0xb7b7aa6d] 6: /usr/bin/X [0x815809e] 7: /usr/bin/X(Dispatch+0x1af) [0x808f68f] 8: /usr/bin/X(main+0x47e) [0x807717e] 9: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe0) [0xb7c8bfe0] 10: /usr/bin/X(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0x1e5) [0x8076501]
But I know next to nothing about GL, so I'm out of my depth there. I'd welcome any suggestions on how to provoke the crash more regularly so that I could attempt to bisect.
Thanks, Tilman
-- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |