Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:27:52 -0500 | From | Roger Heflin <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.24.3: regular sata drive resets - worrisome? |
| |
Tejun Heo wrote: >>> I can offer to you rebuilding that md in a test environment, and >>> giving you access to it, if you're interested. > > Can you hook up those failed drives to a different controller? Say, > ahci or ata_piix and put them under write load (ext3 w/ barrier=1 and > copying lots of files into it should work) and see whether the problem > reproduces?
I can move switch the disks to a sata_promise controller, I also have a sata_via controller but I cannot get those disks to work at all on it (it initially sees the disk, but does not finish init).
I don't on the machine that those disks are on have any other sata controllers.
> >> Here are the errors I get, though look at it closer, I am don't appear >> to be getting the reset, just this error from time to time: >> >> sd 9:0:0:0: [sde] 976773168 512-byte hardware sectors (500108 MB) >> sd 9:0:0:0: [sde] Write Protect is off >> sd 9:0:0:0: [sde] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 >> sd 9:0:0:0: [sde] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't >> support DPO or FUA >> ata8.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x280000 action 0x0 >> ata8.00: BMDMA2 stat 0x687d8009 >> ata8.00: cmd 25/00:80:a7:00:1d/00:01:1d:00:00/e0 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data >> 196608 in >> res 51/04:8f:98:01:1d/00:00:1d:00:00/f0 Emask 0x1 (device error) >> ata8.00: configured for UDMA/100 > > That's device abort error on read. The drive just can't read sector one > of the requested sectors and it's not sata_sil24. It's a bmdma one. > >> I have 4 identical disks, with all 4 connected to the SIL controller >> all give some errors, moving 2 of the disks to a promise controller >> makes the errors go away on the 2 connected to the promise >> controller. All drives are part of a software raid5 array. > > Ah.. okay, sata_sil. Roger, the moving and errors are not very likely > to have anything to do with each other. The only possibility is > transmission problems but the drive didn't report transport error (ICRC) > and it's more likely that the drive was experiencing temporary failures. > It's also possible that the drive set ABRT although there was some > problem with the transport tho. > > If you move the drive back to the sata_sil, do those problems appear > again? Anyways, this doesn't really have anything to do with what Hans > is seeing.
I can swap the disk around next time I reboot the machine, the 2 on the promise will go to the sil and the 2 on the sil will go to the promise, from past testing I expect the disk on the sil to have the errors and the ones on the promise to not have errors.
After I looked at the error more carefully and I though that too, I had originally thought I was getting resets also but I was wrong on that.
Roger
| |