Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.6.25-rc3-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.24 | From | "Zhang, Yanmin" <> | Date | Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:15:54 +0800 |
| |
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 09:19 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 16:57 +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote: > >>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9978 > >>> Subject : 2.6.25-rc1: volanoMark 45% regression > >>> Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> > >>> Date : 2008-02-13 10:30 > >>> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/128 > >>> Handled-By : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > >>> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > >> > >> Peter's revert of the load balance patches should fix this one. Yanmin, > >> could you please confirm if the patch at > >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/25/202 helps? > > I tested it against 2.6.25-rc3 on my 16-core tigerton machine. It really improves > > volano result although it doesn't recover all the result. > > Comparing with 2.6.24, without the patch, volanoMark has about 50% regression > > with 2.6.25-rc3. With the patch, volanoMark has about 15% regression. > > > > Have you had a chance to git-bisect the culprit after the revert? How to bisect it if the reverted patch is submitted after the culprit patch?
-yanmin
| |