lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2 of 4] hotplug-memory: adding non-section-aligned memory is bad
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:51:26 -0700
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
>
>
>>> (I wrote online_page() in above, but online_pages() is maybe better.
>>> It does all what you want.)
>>>
>>>
>> No, for my use-case the pages must be onlined one by one as they get
>> some physical memory assigned to them. At the time I do add_memory(),
>> I'm just allocating page structures, but there's no memory backing that
>> range.
>>
>>
> yes, I see.
>
>
>> That's why I need to disable the sysfs onlining interface, because it
>> bulk onlines the pages before there's anything behind them.
>>
>>
>
> My point is. online_pages() does following things.
>
> - call notifier
> - update information , total_pages etc...
> - re-configure zonelist if necessary...
>
> But online_page() not. Hmm...
>
> How about capturing online_page() by balloon ?
>

You're saying that using online_page() on each page on its own is not
sufficient?

> ex.)
> ==
> call add_memory() to create mem_map
> call online_pages() against the whole section. <=== call this without sysfs.
> online_pages() do misc. jobs
> call online_page() one by one (arch dependent) called by walk_memory_resource.
> online_page() will finally call free_page(page).
> <=========== Xen capture here.
> Don't free onlined page and swallow them into baloon driver.
> ==
>

I'm not sure what you mean by "capture" here. Do you mean a hook? I'd
rather not have to put some Xen-specific hook in here.

What would happen if I did online_pages(pfn, 1) on each page as I
populate it?

J


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-28 05:23    [W:0.050 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site