[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: r-o bind in nfsd

> Maybe some enhancement to the 'intent' structure with a similar
> effect could be done instead.
> Then you could, presumably, put a security hook somewhere in
> link_path_walk for those modules (like AppArmor) which want to do
> checks based on the namespace.

I think link_path_walk() is not a good place to insert new LSM hooks
for pathname based access control (AppArmor and TOMOYO) purpose because

(1) The kernel don't know what operation (open/create/truncate etc.) will be
done at the moment of link_path_walk().

(2) Not all operations call link_path_walk() before these operations
are done. For example, ftruncate() doesn't call link_path_walk().

(3) The rename() and link() operations handle two pathnames.
But, it is not possible to know both pathnames at the moment of

I think we need to introduce new LSM hooks outside link_path_walk().

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-25 12:49    [W:0.093 / U:0.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site