lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH 3/3] signals: allow the kernel to actually kill /sbin/init
Currently the buggy /sbin/init hangs if SIGSEGV/etc happens. The kernel sends
the signal, init dequeues it and ignores, returns from the exception, repeats
the faulting instruction, and so on forever.

Imho, such a behaviour is not good. I think that the explicit loud death of
the buggy /sbin/init is better than the silent hang.

Change force_sig_info() to clear SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE when the task should be
really killed.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>

--- 25/kernel/signal.c~3_INIT_SIGSEGV 2008-03-16 15:45:56.000000000 +0300
+++ 25/kernel/signal.c 2008-03-16 16:14:56.000000000 +0300
@@ -877,7 +877,8 @@ specific_send_sig_info(int sig, struct s
* since we do not want to have a signal handler that was blocked
* be invoked when user space had explicitly blocked it.
*
- * We don't want to have recursive SIGSEGV's etc, for example.
+ * We don't want to have recursive SIGSEGV's etc, for example,
+ * that is why we also clear SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE.
*/
int
force_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t)
@@ -897,6 +898,8 @@ force_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *
recalc_sigpending_and_wake(t);
}
}
+ if (action->sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL)
+ t->signal->flags &= ~SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE;
ret = specific_send_sig_info(sig, info, t);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&t->sighand->siglock, flags);



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-23 14:05    [W:0.021 / U:1.716 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site