[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24)
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 2:59 PM, H. Peter Anvin <> wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Ingo/Thomas - should ioremap*() perhaps take "resource_size_t" or a "u64"
> > for the address (and then "__ioremap()" should probably take a PFN, not a
> > physical address, and that one can remain just a "unsigned long"?)
> >
> resource_size_t seems to make sense here. In the case when we have
> 64-bit resources but no PAE support we should error our when the
> resource is out of range rather than silently fail.
> > Has anybody ever had a working 64-bit BAR on x86? Ivan? Maybe I'm missing
> > something..
> 64-bit BAR, certainly. 64-bit BAR with a value beyond 4 GB I would find
> questionable at best... I suspect the answer is "no".
Opteron system with coprocessor on socket or HTX slot. will use 64bit
BAR above 4g and size is more than 4g too.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-23 00:31    [W:0.305 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site