[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] x86: bitops asm constraint fixes
Jan Beulich wrote:
> That's not very desirable: For one part, because there are uses of
> bitops on arrays of ints (and casting these up isn't fully correct on
> x86-64 because of the same reason that using the bitops on char
> arrays isn't correct (see the other response I sent to Jeremy's reply),
> but also because operating on longs requires REX prefixes n x86-64,
> hence making the code bigger for no good reason.

It might be worthwhile to find out if 64-bit bitops are faster.

Bitops are normally defined only on longs, but since x86 is a
littleendian architecture we sometimes fudge that in arch-specific code.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-19 20:29    [W:0.038 / U:0.632 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site