On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > > > Does RC5 resolve this? > > Nope. > > e82cc1288fa57857c6af8c57f3d07096d4bcd9d9 (post -rc5) looks like it > might fix it -- I'll re-test with that applied as well.
Sorry, I forgot that made it just *after* RC5. That's the patch I was interested in.