Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables. | From | Martin Schwidefsky <> | Date | Wed, 06 Feb 2008 10:06:18 +0100 |
| |
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 10:46 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I got x86-64 compiled by removing the #include <asm/pgalloc.h> from > > asm-generic/tlb.h. But who knows what will break if the include is > > missing .. I'll cross compile some of the other architectures next. > > > > urgh, well, thanks for trying. If there's significant risk factor (or > hassle) in fixing the macros then I'd suggest we not do it for now - it's a > separate project.
I'm still at it. I does make sense to convert the damn macros to inline functions. The question now is the order of things, the macro cleanup first or the sub-page page tables first? I would prefer the sub-page page tables first since that code has been hanging around in -mm for a while and could go upstream after I regenerated the patch and test compiled it again. We do need it for KVM and we want to push our KVM patches for s390 soon.
-- blue skies, Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
| |