Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS | From | Stephen Smalley <> | Date | Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:46:56 -0500 |
| |
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 21:39 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 "Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)" <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> wrote: > > > hi all! > > > > in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged > > in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon can i the > > .config send, and i bisected the kernel, when i have time. > > > > pictures from crash: > > http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/ > > It looks like selinux's file_has_perm() is doing spin_lock() on an > uninitialised (or already locked) spinlock.
The trace looks bogus to me - I don't see how file_has_perm() could have been called there, and file_has_perm() doesn't directly take any spin locks.
-- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |