Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:36:39 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: Interactivity issue in 2.6.25-rc3 |
| |
* Carlos R. Mafra <crmafra2@gmail.com> wrote:
> > and obviously, even if you only 'feel' long delays that's too an > > anomaly by definition, no matter what the scripts say about it. It > > might even be a scheduler anomaly as well: for example if the > > scheduler clock has an anomaly - on which the delay statistics are > > based too. > > But if the scripts say all 'se.wait_max' are < 40 msecs than it is not > CFS' fault, right? Even if it takes 3 seconds for a typed letter to > appear in the terminal?
yeah, in 99.9% of the cases it's not the scheduler's fault.
Ingo
| |