Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:48:48 +0300 | From | "Alexey Zaytsev" <> | Subject | Re: bcm43xx regression in 2.6.24 (with patch) |
| |
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de> wrote: > On Tuesday 26 February 2008 23:41:55 Michael Buesch wrote: > > On Tuesday 26 February 2008 23:12:32 Alexey Zaytsev wrote: > > > > Yeah, seems so. But if you are willing to test an adjusted version, I can > > > > probably do a backported version of this patch. > > > > This patch is well tested and does the right thing, so I'm willing to sign > > > > off a backported version of this. > > > > First need to find the place in the old phy.c code that matches the new wa.c code. > > > > > > > I'll do the testing. > > > > Index: linux-2.6.24.3/drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.24.3.orig/drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c 2008-02-26 23:39:39.000000000 +0100 > > +++ linux-2.6.24.3/drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c 2008-02-26 23:39:43.000000000 +0100 > > @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static void op64_fill_descriptor(struct > > addrhi = (((u64) dmaaddr >> 32) & ~SSB_DMA_TRANSLATION_MASK); > > addrext = (((u64) dmaaddr >> 32) & SSB_DMA_TRANSLATION_MASK) > [snip] > > So are you actually going to do this anytime soon? >
Sorry for the delay. Yes, it worked fine.
Btw, when booting the system with the b43 driver, I get a ~30 socond delay after the boot scripts report "Waiting for /dev to be fully populated" and all the modules get loaded. Is this something expected?
> -- > Greetings Michael. >
| |