lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: bcm43xx regression in 2.6.24 (with patch)
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 February 2008 23:41:55 Michael Buesch wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 February 2008 23:12:32 Alexey Zaytsev wrote:
> > > > Yeah, seems so. But if you are willing to test an adjusted version, I can
> > > > probably do a backported version of this patch.
> > > > This patch is well tested and does the right thing, so I'm willing to sign
> > > > off a backported version of this.
> > > > First need to find the place in the old phy.c code that matches the new wa.c code.
> > > >
> > > I'll do the testing.
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.24.3/drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.24.3.orig/drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c 2008-02-26 23:39:39.000000000 +0100
> > +++ linux-2.6.24.3/drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c 2008-02-26 23:39:43.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static void op64_fill_descriptor(struct
> > addrhi = (((u64) dmaaddr >> 32) & ~SSB_DMA_TRANSLATION_MASK);
> > addrext = (((u64) dmaaddr >> 32) & SSB_DMA_TRANSLATION_MASK)
> [snip]
>
> So are you actually going to do this anytime soon?
>

Sorry for the delay. Yes, it worked fine.

Btw, when booting the system with the b43 driver, I get a
~30 socond delay after the boot scripts report
"Waiting for /dev to be fully populated" and all the modules
get loaded. Is this something expected?



> --
> Greetings Michael.
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-28 23:51    [W:0.087 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site