lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH [RT] 11/14] optimize the !printk fastpath through the lock acquisition
[repost with all folks CCed]

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Gregory Haskins
<gregory.haskins.ml@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you saying that the modified logic that I introduced is broken? Or
> that the original use of the might_sleep() annotation inside this
> function is broken?

It's probably safe to use, but it's not what its original purpose was
and you should use another function/macro. This is an annotation issue
and your use of it is inconsistent with how it's used in voluntary
preempt. I mentioned it before in a previous post. Folks will correct
me if I'm wrong but you should use another macro or function.

bill


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-25 07:23    [W:0.080 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site