Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: Hang on suspend | Date | Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:49:29 +0100 |
| |
On Sunday, 24 of February 2008, Julian Blake Kongslie wrote: > On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 23:35 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > [Please don't drop the CC list from replies.] > > Yeah, sorry, I accidentally whacked the wrong reply button. > > > On Sunday, 24 of February 2008, Julian Blake Kongslie wrote: > > > On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 12:23 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Can you please check what's at the address platform_suspend_late+0x19? > > > > > > 0xc0253ca9 is in platform_suspend_late (drivers/base/platform.c:579). > > > 574 { > > > 575 struct platform_driver *drv = to_platform_driver(dev->driver); > > > 576 struct platform_device *pdev; > > > 577 int ret = 0; > > > 578 > > > 579 pdev = container_of(dev, struct platform_device, dev); > > > 580 if (dev->driver && drv->suspend_late) > > > 581 ret = drv->suspend_late(pdev, mesg); > > > 582 > > > 583 return ret; > > > > That's strange, it looks like the container_of() accessing beyond the > > structure. > > > > Is this 100% reproducible? > > Yes, it is. I've had this hang on suspend since at least some time in > early 2.6.24-rc, although because I have to transcribe the oops manually > I haven't had enough incentive to get it reported until now. > Unfortunately, I just don't need to suspend very often, so it may have > been introduced some time before then. > > If you don't have any other ideas,
No, I don't.
> I can try to bisect and find the change that introduced it,
That would be great.
> but it'll probably take me a day or two; I have other things I need to use my > computer for, so it's a bit difficult to do the constant-reboot-and-test > cycle.
Not a problem at all.
Thanks, Rafael
| |