Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:17:20 +0300 | From | "Alexey Zaytsev" <> | Subject | Re: bcm43xx regression in 2.6.24 (with patch) |
| |
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote: > Hi Alexey, > > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote: > > > > So does reverting commit 753f492093da7a40141bfe083073400f518f4c68 > > > ("[B44]: port to native ssb support") fix the regression? > > > > > > On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Alexey Zaytsev wrote: > > Compiling it right now. > > > > I'm sure it fixes the problem, but I don't feel like we should revert > > it. I can't > > be sure it won't cause any other problems, and anyway, this does not look > > right a solution. Any other driver (rightfully) requiring the SSB_HOST would > > then also break the bcm43xx driver. > > > > I'll send an simplified patch in a few minutes. > > The point here is that it's Michael's patch and I don't want to start > blaming anyone until you've verified it actually broke your setup. And if > the problem was actually caused by that patch, Michael needs to either ACK > your patch or fix it himself.
Yes, the problem was caused by this patch. With it reverted, I've got both ethernet and wifi working.
> > Pekka >
| |