Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:15:12 -0500 (EST) | From | Alan Stern <> | Subject | Re: USB regression (and other failures) in 2.6.2[45]* - mostly resolved |
| |
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> > What do you mean by "does not see the drive"? > > Its detect-hardware-and-report mode shows a HD size of 0 (which is what > it has showed in cases where the kernel has not detected the drive), its > detect-partitions-and-report mode shows no partitions and no devices > which can have partitions, and attempting to actually use it to pull > down a drive image (it's a disk-imaging program) causes it to hang at > the point where it would begin to write. > > Hmm. One thing which just sprang to mind, in the stab-in-the-dark > category: in 2.6.24.2, launching the program on some machines gave > warnings along the lines of "this program is using a deprecated ioctl, > please convert it to SG_IO" (which I naturally cannot do since it's > closed and I don't have the source),
You can ask the program's author to update it.
> but IIRC in the 2.5.25-rc2-based > disc with ACPI enabled no such message appears. If the reason that there > are no longer such messages is that the ioctl in question has now been > removed, that might explain why the program does not see the drive.
Could be. You can use strace to find out what system calls the program is making.
> I'm not sure I expressed myself clearly. I do not think the problem is > with the different kernels. I think the problem is with the different > configurations. I am asking if there are any established techniques for > comparing differences between config files from widely different > kernels.
Not as far as I know.
Alan Stern
| |