| Date | Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:23:32 +1100 | From | Stephen Rothwell <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: first tree |
| |
Hi Andy,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:04:36 +0000 Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> wrote: > > As devout believers in testing things early we test -mm and -git releases > as they drop. I am keen that we are able to continue this with the -next > tree once it gets going. Having just pulled this tree its not obvious how > I would communicate which tree I had tested. I guess we could use the > SHA1 of the actual head used, but that really is cumbersome for the poor > people who have to check the results and actually report things to lkml.
I hope I have addressed this issue by tagging each tree with its date i.e. todays was next-20080220.
> Also will you be producing any tarballs for these releases? If so I > would say they would definatly need to be against some common base, like > against the nearest official tag "below".
I hadn't considered tarballs, but I will give it some thought.
Thanks for your thoughts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |