Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:50:45 +0900 (JST) | Subject | Re: atmel_spi clock polarity | From | Atsushi Nemoto <> |
| |
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:34:46 +0100, Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> wrote: > In that case, I think the best fix is to let NPCS0 stay selected > permanently in MR and overwrite CSR0 with to the new slave's settings > before asserting CS. But that's a more complicated change, and I don't > know how it will affect the AT91RM9200 special cases. > > So I suggest we merge your patch for 2.6.25, and try to optimize it > for 2.6.26.
I absolutely agree.
> David, do you want me to pass on the patch with my signoff or just ask > Andrew to add my Acked-by to the patch already in mm?
The patch in mm also lacks my Signed-off line. I had thought Andrew never take a patch without Signed-off line ;)
Should I resend my patch with my Signed-off and Haavard's Acked-by?
--- Atsushi Nemoto
| |