lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.24-git7: section mismatches woes
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:32:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 of January 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 07:50:43PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I get these messages, the majority of which seem to be false-positives:
> > ...
> > > modpost: Found 35 section mismatch(es).
> > > To see additional details select "Enable full Section mismatch analysis"
> > > in the Kernel Hacking menu (CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH).
> > Looking in to these atm.
> >
> > >
> > > and if I compile the kernel with CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH, it breaks resuming
> > > from RAM.
> >
> > The only functional difference when you enable CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH is the
> > addition of the -fno-inline-functions-called-once to CFLAGS.
> > So we have some code somewhere that breaks if it is not inlined by gcc.
> >
> > It would be nice to sort out where.
> > If you have a rough idea where to look
>
> No, I don't.
>
> It looks like there's somewhere in arch/x86, since I ruled out kernel/power and
> drivers/acpi already.

Hi Rafael.

Do you plan to look closer into this or do you have an easy receipe so
I can test myself (on a x86 64 bit box)?

Sam


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-02 19:11    [W:0.087 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site