Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 2 Feb 2008 19:00:02 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test |
| |
* David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > Plus, the way you're doing it now is violating the locking > > > protocol used by that driver. > > > > Yep, you are right, but that is the easy issue to fix. > > Which is why I was puzzled that you didn't start out doing it the > "right" way ... even just hard-wiring the dubious assumption that > "rtc0" is the right RTC to use. :)
because this was mostly about an quick & easy hack to see whether it makes sense at all to automate the testing of suspend/resume. (People who want to use RTC functionality might not have the desire to get into extending it straight away - they just want something rather obvious done and that's it.)
Ingo
| |