lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test

* David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:

> > > Plus, the way you're doing it now is violating the locking
> > > protocol used by that driver.
> >
> > Yep, you are right, but that is the easy issue to fix.
>
> Which is why I was puzzled that you didn't start out doing it the
> "right" way ... even just hard-wiring the dubious assumption that
> "rtc0" is the right RTC to use. :)

because this was mostly about an quick & easy hack to see whether it
makes sense at all to automate the testing of suspend/resume. (People
who want to use RTC functionality might not have the desire to get into
extending it straight away - they just want something rather obvious
done and that's it.)

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-02 19:03    [W:0.182 / U:1.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site