Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:44:59 +0100 | From | "Torsten Kaiser" <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc2 |
| |
On Feb 19, 2008 12:54 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Torsten Kaiser wrote: > > > > [ 5282.056415] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > [ 5282.059757] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:33! > > Is there any chance that you could try to bisect this, if it's repeatable > enough for you? Even if you can't bisect it *all* the way, it would be > really good to do a handful of bisection runs which should already > hopefully narrow it down a bit more. > > Linus >
It's repeatable, but not in a really reliable way. So to mark a kernel good I need to compile around 100 KDE packages, and even then I'm not 100% sure, if it's good or if I was just lucky.
But I did a partly bisect against 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: 2.6.24-rc6 + mm-patches up to (including) git.nfsd -> worked 2.6.24-rc6 + mm-patches up to (including) git.xfs -> crashed
I think the only added patch between rc2-mm1 and rc3-mm2 in that range where the iommu changes that I later ruled out. That leaves some git trees as suspects: git-ocfs2.patch git-selinux.patch git-s390.patch git-sched.patch git-sh.patch git-scsi-misc.patch git-unionfs.patch git-v9fs.patch git-watchdog.patch git-wireless.patch git-ipwireless_cs.patch git-x86.patch git-xfs.patch
(see http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120276641105256 )
Torsten
| |