Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:51:34 -0800 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24 |
| |
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:24:53 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > > > question: can we please list the last known good version for each > > entry? Since these are all regressions (right?) that information > > ought to be available and usually helps down in narrowing causes.. > > Well, this usually is only obvious for the cases in which the
last-known-good SHOULD be obvious. These are regressions right? A regression means "version X worked, version Y does not". If there is no version X, it's not a regression.
Knowing version X is helpful to know how far back to look.
-- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org
| |